• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9798
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Bylines Scotland
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Science and tech
  • Podcast
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Science and tech
  • Podcast
Bylines Scotland
Home Politics Holyrood Election 2026

Why the electoral system matters – Holyrood election 2026

The outcome of any democratic election depends on how voters cast their ballot, yet the electoral system shapes the result too

Professor Sir John Curtice by Professor Sir John Curtice
05-01-2026 07:55
in Election 2026, Holyrood, Opinion
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
Sir Prof. john Curtice profile's picture

Image provided by the author. Printed with permission

Share on Bluesky

Ultimately, the outcome of any democratic election depends on how voters decide to cast their ballot. However, the impact of their choice also depends on how their votes are treated by the electoral system. That is likely to prove particularly the case in the Scottish Parliament election in May.

As at previous devolved elections, the battle for Holyrood will be conducted using a variant of the ‘Additional Member System’. It comes in two parts. Of the 129 MSPs to be elected, well over half will be chosen using first-past-the-post. In 73 separate constituencies, voters will be able to cast a vote for their local MSP. Whichever candidate secures most votes in each seat is elected. At previous Holyrood contests, the Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and the SNP have put up a candidate in every constituency, whereas the Greens have only contested a handful. It remains to be seen how many constituencies Reform will decide to fight.

The remaining 56 seats are elected using a system of proportional representation. For this purpose, Scotland is divided into eight regions, each of which elects seven ‘additional’ members. Each party puts forward a list of candidates in rank order. Voters are invited to vote for one of these regional party lists – they can vote for the party whose candidate they have backed as their local constituency MSP or for a different party. Crucially, the seven additional members are allocated to the parties such that the overall tally of seats in a region – both constituency and list – is as proportional as possible to the share of the list vote cast for each party in that region.

The constituency race

Polls taken towards the end of 2025 put the SNP, on average, at 34% on the constituency ballot, well down from the 48% the party secured at the last Holyrood election in 2021. Nevertheless, the SNP were still well ahead of its nearest rivals, that is, Reform on 20% and Labour on 16%. Trailing further behind were the Conservatives with 10% and the Liberal Democrats with 9%, while the Greens (who again may not contest many constituencies) were on 8%.

Support for the SNP does not vary a great deal from one part of Scotland to another. Given the size of its Scotland-wide lead, on these figures the party is therefore likely to be ahead in most constituencies. Consequently, despite the fall in its support, the SNP might well retain all but a handful of the 62 constituency seats the party won in 2021. In that event, the outcome of the constituency contests would be highly disproportional. The party will likely have won three-quarters to four-fifths of the constituency seats on little more than a third of the vote.

A barrier for Reform and the Greens?

On the evidence of last year’s Westminster election, support for Reform could also be quite evenly spread across Scotland. But whereas first-past-the-post is generous to a party with an evenly spread vote that is well in the lead (because it comes first in most constituencies), it punishes a second (or third) placed party whose share of the vote is much the same everywhere (because it comes second or third almost everywhere).  As a result, Reform might fail to win a single constituency seat – along with the Greens. In contrast, the other opposition parties – the Conservatives, Labour, and the Liberal Democrats – all have local fiefdoms that should ensure they all at least win some constituency seats.

Reform is thus likely to be especially dependent on winning regional party list seats. At 19%, their level of support on the list vote in recent polls has been similar to their 20% support on the constituency ballot. Much the same is true of Labour (16%), the Conservatives (12%), and the Liberal Democrats (9%). But, at 29%, support for the SNP on the list vote has been markedly lower, not least because those who say they would back the SNP on the constituency vote are especially likely to say they would support the Greens on the list vote. Indeed, at 12%, support for the Greens has been both four points higher than on the constituency ballot and four points up on what the party won in 2021.

Friends of Bylines Network

There has never been a greater need for grassroots journalism that investigates the stories that really matter, holds power to account and champions the voices of everyday citizens. We are proudly powered by volunteers but what we do isn’t free.

STAND WITH US for independent, citizen-led journalism that makes democracy stronger, and you will even get some exclusive benefits.

BECOME A FRIEND

Compensation on the list?

Consequently, as at previous Holyrood elections, the Greens will be dependent on the allocation of list seats. But this time around, the single biggest beneficiary could prove to be Nigel Farage’s party. Indeed, if Reform does emerge as the second most popular in list votes, it could win sufficient list seats to become the second largest party and thus the official opposition at Holyrood.

However, under these circumstances the allocation of list seats will not correct fully the over-representation secured by the SNP in the constituency contests. The party’s likely success in those would mean that, despite not being awarded a single list seat, the nationalists will have 45% or so of the seats in the chamber, well above the party’s 29% share of the list vote. There are simply too few party list seats to reverse the SNP’s likely over-representation on the constituency ballot.

One election in two different parts

Between them, then, the two parts of Holyrood’s electoral system are likely to have a significant impact on the shape of the next Holyrood chamber. The outcome of the first-past-the-post contests could well ensure that, despite being far less popular than five years ago, the SNP remain the dominant force in the parliament. Yet at the same time, by ensuring both the Greens and Reform secure representation they might otherwise lack, the allocation of party list seats could still prove crucial. The Greens could do well enough to ensure that, together with the SNP, there is once again a pro-independence majority at Holyrood.

Meanwhile, the list part of the system opens up the possibility that Reform could become the second largest party in seats should they manage to emerge as the second largest party in votes. All of which could leave the Conservatives, Labour, and the Liberal Democrats at risk of all looking a little bit like ‘also rans’.


More on Holyrood:

Podcast

Bylines Scotland Radio – Professor John Curtice.

by Bylines Scotland
31 October 2025

Sign up for the Bylines Scotland newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Professor Sir John Curtice

Professor Sir John Curtice

John Curtice is Professor of Politics at Strathclyde University, and Senior Research Fellow, Scottish Centre for Social Research and the ESRC’s ‘The UK in a Changing Europe’ initiative. He has written extensively about voting behaviour in elections and referendums in the UK, as well as on British and Scottish political and social attitudes more generally. He is also Chief Commentator at whatscotlandthinks.org which provides a comprehensive collection of materials on public attitudes towards how Scotland should be governed.

Related Posts

Opinion

Why the truth matters in these beleaguered times for our democracy

by Jonathan Fox
11 October 2026
Economics

Austerity: the banker-led assault on humanity

by David Murray
7 October 2026
My Scotland

The restoration of ‘Killie’ civic pride

by Kenneth Crane
6 October 2026
Opinion

When lies turn into fire: Possilpark’s housing dream damaged by misinformation

by Sadia Sikandar
3 October 2026
Holyrood

Do not walk out on democratic duties

by James Jobson
28 September 2026
Next Post
A photo of a Scottish player Joe Jordan playing against a Peruvian player Rubén Toribio Díazand at the World Cup 1978

"As ithers see us" – Robert Burns‘ poem ‘To a Louse’

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Charity Christmas Climate Change Council areas Covid19 culture Defence Defence and security Democracy Devolution Election environment European Movement Fish Farms Glasgow History Holyrood Journalism Labour literature Monarchy Monetary policy NHS NHS Scotland Out and about politics Press release Pulse of the NHS Reviews Rights and freedoms Russia Scientific research Scotland Scottish economics ScottishIndependence ShipBuilding SNP society Sport and recreation Tories UK economics Ukraine Universal Basic Income Westminster

MY SCOTLAND

A pretty path stretching from a stunner of a town to a beauty of a village

5 October 2026

LETTERS

Person typing an email

Letters to the editor

22 December 2023
Bylines Scotland

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Scotland and beyond.

Bylines Scotland is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2022-2026 Bylines Scotland. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9798

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Economics
    • Education
    • Scotland
  • Politics
    • Brexit
    • Europe
    • Holyrood
      • Election 2026
    • United Kingdom
    • World
  • Society
    • Arts and entertainment
    • Culture
    • History
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Science and tech
  • Authors and editors
  • Podcast

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2022-2026 Bylines Scotland. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9798

-
00:00
00:00

Queue

Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00