• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9798
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Bylines Scotland
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Science and tech
  • Podcast
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Science and tech
  • Podcast
Bylines Scotland
Home Politics

Trust hits new low: 45% of people think politicians put party before country

The public mood towards this election has darkened further. The circumstances this time for such are very different from 2019

Professor Sir John Curtice by Professor Sir John Curtice
13-06-2024 06:49
in Politics, United Kingdom
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
Man in a suit swearing an oath while having his fingers crossed behind his back

image by alpha spirit.it. Licensed by Shuttetstock [SD]

Share on Bluesky

There is an air of deja vu about this election. Trust and confidence in how Britain is governed is as low as it has ever been – just as it was shortly before the last election five years ago.

Yet the circumstances that have given rise to the public’s pessimistic outlook this time are very different from 2019.

In the weeks and months leading up to the last election, voters’ confidence in politics and politicians was shaken by parliament’s apparent inability to decide the UK’s future relationship with the EU.

Now, according to the latest British social attitudes (BSA) report from the National Centre for Social Research, the public mood has darkened further.

In 2019, 34% said they “almost never” trusted “British governments of any party to put the needs of the country above the interests of their own political party”. Now, as many as 45% express that view – a record high in response to a question that has been asked regularly over the past 30 years.

Meanwhile, in 2019, 79% said that the system of governing Britain was in need of “quite a lot” or “a great deal” of improvement. This represented a record high for a question first asked 50 years ago when the country was facing a worsening inflationary spiral and serious industrial unrest. Despite those difficulties, in 1973, only 49% reckoned at that time that there was a need for significant improvement.

Now, according to the latest BSA, once again, 79% say that “quite a lot” or “a great deal” of improvement is required.

A consequence of this decline in trust and confidence appears to have been an increased appetite for re-examining some of Britain’s constitutional rules. A record 53% say that we should change the voting system used to elect the House of Commons so that smaller political parties “get a fair share of MPs”.

Just under half (49%), more than at any point in the last 25 years, now support some form of devolution for England, either through regional assemblies or an English parliament. In both cases, support is markedly higher among those with low levels of trust and confidence.

From Brexit bounce to leavers’ remorse

After the 2019 election, there were signs of improvement in levels of trust and confidence. The proportion looking for substantial improvement in how the country is governed fell in 2020 to 61%, while just 23% said they almost never trusted governments.

But this fall occurred almost entirely among just one half of the population – those who had voted leave in the 2016 Brexit referendum.

The proportion of leavers who felt the country’s system of government needed a great deal of improvement fell sharply from 81% in 2019 to 54% in 2020. Similarly, the proportion who said they almost never trusted the government dropped from 40% to 25%. The success (from their point of view) of Brexit had seemingly given them renewed faith in how they were being governed. In contrast, there was barely any movement among those who had voted remain.

However, Brexit is not as popular now as it was five years ago. The latest opinion polls suggest that, on average, three in five people might vote to rejoin the EU. As many as 71% think the economy is worse off as a result of leaving the EU, while 48% feel immigration to the UK is higher as a result of the decision. Even around a half of those who voted leave concur with those views.

Leavers’ apparent disappointment with what has happened since the UK left the EU has been accompanied by a reversal of the decline in low trust and confidence that had been in evidence in 2020.

Now, as many as 76% believe that Britain’s system of government needs a lot of improvement, only slightly below the 81% who expressed that view in 2019. At the same time, 48% almost never trust governments to prioritise the nation’s needs, slightly above the 40% who felt that way in 2019.

Poor services, low trust

It is not just unhappiness with Brexit that has occasioned the fall in trust and confidence. Levels of dissatisfaction with the NHS are at a record high. And those who are unhappy about the state of the health service are markedly less happy with how Britain is being governed.

As many as 86% of those who are dissatisfied with the NHS say the system of government needs improvement, while 52% almost never trust governments. The equivalent figures among those who are satisfied are 65% and 32%, respectively.

Unsurprisingly, more people now say they are struggling with their income than was the case before 2019. And those in that position have lower trust and confidence, too. As many as 57% say they never trust the government, while 85% believe Britain’s system of government could be improved a lot.

And while it is impossible to show directly, doubtless the political turmoil that has surrounded the fall of two prime ministers may well have served to undermine trust and confidence too.

The challenge facing the next government will not only be to repair the damage that the pandemic, inflation and war have all inflicted on the economy. It will also be to assuage the widespread concern that the public once again have about how they are being governed.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


More on politics

Professor John Curtice SNP analysis
Politics

What really lies behind the SNP’s slip in the polls?

by Professor Sir John Curtice
9 August 2023
Tags: Election

Sign up for the Bylines Scotland newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Professor Sir John Curtice

Professor Sir John Curtice

John Curtice is Professor of Politics at Strathclyde University, and Senior Research Fellow, Scottish Centre for Social Research and the ESRC’s ‘The UK in a Changing Europe’ initiative. He has written extensively about voting behaviour in elections and referendums in the UK, as well as on British and Scottish political and social attitudes more generally. He is also Chief Commentator at whatscotlandthinks.org which provides a comprehensive collection of materials on public attitudes towards how Scotland should be governed.

Related Posts

Axum, Ethiopia - Feb 11, 2020: Ethiopian people seen on the road from Axum to Gheralta, Tigray in Northern Ethiopia, Africa
World

Tigray – the hidden genocide

by Anna Gessesse
28 August 2026
Economics

The Just Transition: Scotland’s “biggest act of self-harm”?

by Jess Hillary
22 August 2026
Politics

I survived being called a ‘cockroach’. That’s why I know words can be dangerous  

by Nadine Tunasi
21 August 2026
Economics

The growing threat of extreme wealth

by Geoff Thompson
20 August 2026
Montage: Anas Sarwar against the backdrop of Downing Street where he attends cabinet meetings
Holyrood

Sarwar shows Scotland his true colours

by James Jobson
11 August 2026
Next Post
Heart and cardiogram illustration depicting the NHS

Do we need independence to save the NHS in Scotland?

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Charity Christmas Climate Change Council areas Covid19 culture Defence Defence and security Democracy Devolution Election European Movement Fish Farms Glasgow History Holyrood Iran Journalism Labour literature Monarchy Monetary policy NHS NHS Scotland Out and about politics Press release Pulse of the NHS Reviews Rights and freedoms Russia Scientific research Scotland Scottish economics ScottishIndependence ShipBuilding SNP society Sport and recreation Tories UK economics Ukraine Universal Basic Income Westminster

MY SCOTLAND

Falling in love with Loch Leven

7 September 2026

LETTERS

Person typing an email

Letters to the editor

22 December 2023
Bylines Scotland

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Scotland and beyond.

Bylines Scotland is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2022-2026 Bylines Scotland. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9798

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Economics
    • Education
    • Scotland
  • Politics
    • Brexit
    • Europe
    • Holyrood
      • Election 2026
    • United Kingdom
    • World
  • Society
    • Arts and entertainment
    • Culture
    • History
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Science and tech
  • Authors and editors
  • Podcast

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2022-2026 Bylines Scotland. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9798

-
00:00
00:00

Queue

Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00