• Contact
  • About
  • ISSN 3049-9798
  • Authors and editors
NEWSLETTER SIGN UP
Bylines Scotland
Advertisement
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Science and tech
  • Podcast
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Society
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Science and tech
  • Podcast
Bylines Scotland
Home Politics

What really lies behind the SNP’s slip in the polls?

Electoral expert Professor Sir John Curtice fixes his gaze on the travails of the SNP and analyses the party’s exposure to recent political turmoil

Professor Sir John Curtice by Professor Sir John Curtice
09-08-2023 06:15
in Politics
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
Professor John Curtice SNP analysis

image by Stan. Used with permission from Stan

Share on Bluesky

The SNP have had their difficulties and disappointments since first securing the reins of office at Holyrood in 2007, including losing the 2014 referendum, the Covid pandemic, and a falling out between Nicola Sturgeon and Alex Salmond. However, the last 12 months have proven the most challenging for the party yet.

First of all, early last autumn, the fallout from Liz Truss’s short-lived administration boosted Labour on both sides of the border, not only increasing the threat the party posed to the SNP’s domination of Scotland’s representation at Westminster but also opening up the prospect that Labour might win an overall majority at the next UK general election, thereby denying the SNP the leverage it might have in any hung parliament.

Buffeted by political turbulence

In November, the UK Supreme Court ruled that the Scottish Parliament could not hold any kind of referendum on independence – leaving the party to debate whether the next UK election could be regarded as a ‘de facto’ referendum. In December, the passage of legislation on gender recognition for transgender people gave rise to the biggest parliamentary rebellion in the SNP’s 14 years in office and an unprecedented veto of the legislation by the UK government.

Then in February, Sturgeon announced she was standing down, a decision that gave rise to a fractious leadership contest. Meanwhile, no sooner had Humza Yousaf got his feet under the desk at Bute House, and Peter Murrell, former chief executive of the SNP and Nicola Sturgeon’s husband, was arrested (and then released, without charge) in connection with a police investigation of the SNP’s finances, followed a few weeks later by Sturgeon herself being called in for questioning.

These developments have seemingly taken their toll on the SNP’s popularity. Twelve months ago, the party stood on average at 45% in polls of voting intention for Westminster – in line with the party’s performance in the 2019 UK election. Although Labour had overtaken the Conservatives as the second most popular party north of the border, it was still as much as 21 points behind and seemed no more than a distant threat. Yet in polls taken since the arrest of Sturgeon at the beginning of June, support for the SNP is down to 36% – as weak a position as it has been at any stage since the 2014 referendum.

Labour is, at 34%, breathing down its neck. On these figures Labour might well take some two dozen Westminster seats off the SNP. The picture is much the same for voting intentions for Holyrood, such that, at the moment, a Scottish Parliament election might fail to produce a majority of pro-independence MPs.

Scrutinising the shift in the polls

But which of these adverse developments have actually damaged the SNP? There are a few myths that need busting. Labour’s dramatic rise in the UK polls in the wake of the ‘fiscal event’ that lead to Truss’s downfall had no discernible impact on SNP support. As was the case south of the border, Labour’s advance was primarily at the expense of the Conservatives. Support for the SNP did ease a little to 43% in the wake of the row about gender recognition, but no more than that, and was the level at which it stood when Sturgeon announced her resignation. Meanwhile, the arrest of Murrell and the widespread publicity of the SNP’s financial difficulties to which it gave rise only saw a slight easing of SNP support – at least until the arrest of Sturgeon, which was followed by a two-point fall in SNP support to its current level of 36%.

That leaves one potential main culprit for the SNP’s current difficulties – the SNP leadership contest. As we have already noted it started with the SNP at 43% in the polls. By the time the contest was coming to a conclusion, it had slipped to just below 40%. Meanwhile, once Yousaf had been declared the winner, it had slipped to between 38% and 39%. The election of a new party leader usually gives their party a boost in the polls – but of this, there was no sign at all following Yousaf’s success.

In announcing her resignation from the SNP, Sturgeon said that public attitudes towards her had become a barrier to her party’s progress and that of the wider pro-independence movement. While this was not the only stated reason for her resignation, her claim on this count at least has not been vindicated by events. For while public opinion was divided about her performance in office, for every voter who regarded her unfavourably at the time of her resignation, there was another who felt favourably towards her. Yousaf, in contrast, is relatively unpopular. There are nearly three people who feel unfavourably about him for every two that regard him favourably.

Yousaf’s relative lack of popularity is not confined to unionists. It is also evident among supporters of independence. A little less than half of those who voted Yes in 2014 regard him favourably. In contrast, the equivalent figure for Sturgeon at the time of her resignation was 70%.

Support for independence remains stable despite party woes

This takes us to another key development in the last 12 months – a weakening of the once close link between support for independence and willingness to vote SNP. A year ago, the polls suggested on average that 48% of Scots would vote Yes in an immediate independence referendum. Despite everything in the last 12 months, that figure has not changed. However, whereas a year ago, 77% of those voted Yes in 2014 were backing the SNP, now the figure is just 64%.

The last 12 months have tested the loyalty of the SNP’s ‘natural’ supporters. Above all it has been tested by the outcome of a change of leadership that leaves the party without the charisma at the top that was provided by Salmond and Sturgeon. And even if the police investigation comes to nothing, internal divisions dissipate, and Labour begin to slip in the polls, that potentially crucial gap will still be there. But what, if anything, will the SNP be able to do to overcome it?

Tags: pollsSNP

Sign up for the Bylines Scotland newsletter

* indicates required

Consent for having Bylines Network store my submitted information

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Professor Sir John Curtice

Professor Sir John Curtice

John Curtice is Professor of Politics at Strathclyde University, and Senior Research Fellow, Scottish Centre for Social Research and the ESRC’s ‘The UK in a Changing Europe’ initiative. He has written extensively about voting behaviour in elections and referendums in the UK, as well as on British and Scottish political and social attitudes more generally. He is also Chief Commentator at whatscotlandthinks.org which provides a comprehensive collection of materials on public attitudes towards how Scotland should be governed.

Related Posts

Politics

Coalition for collapse: the far-right edges closer to power

by Naz Saad
18 September 2026
Axum, Ethiopia - Feb 11, 2020: Ethiopian people seen on the road from Axum to Gheralta, Tigray in Northern Ethiopia, Africa
World

Tigray – the hidden genocide

by Anna Gessesse
28 August 2026
Economics

The Just Transition: Scotland’s “biggest act of self-harm”?

by Jess Hillary
22 August 2026
Politics

I survived being called a ‘cockroach’. That’s why I know words can be dangerous  

by Nadine Tunasi
21 August 2026
Economics

The growing threat of extreme wealth

by Geoff Thompson
20 August 2026
Next Post
Banksy art exhibition

Out and about with Charlie Mac: cut and Run, Gallery of Modern Art Glasgow

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CROWDFUNDER

BROWSE BY TAGS

Afghanistan Charity Christmas Climate Change Council areas Covid19 culture Defence Defence and security Democracy Devolution Election European Movement Fish Farms Glasgow History Holyrood Iran Journalism Labour literature Monarchy Monetary policy NHS NHS Scotland Out and about politics Press release Pulse of the NHS Reviews Rights and freedoms Russia Scientific research Scotland Scottish economics ScottishIndependence ShipBuilding SNP society Sport and recreation Tories UK economics Ukraine Universal Basic Income Westminster

MY SCOTLAND

Falling in love with Loch Leven

7 September 2026

LETTERS

Person typing an email

Letters to the editor

22 December 2023
Bylines Scotland

We are a not-for-profit citizen journalism publication. Our aim is to publish well-written, fact-based articles and opinion pieces on subjects that are of interest to people in Scotland and beyond.

Bylines Scotland is a trading brand of Bylines Networks Limited which is separate to, but allied with, Byline Times.

Learn more about us

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Authors and editors
  • Complaints
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Letters
  • Privacy
  • Network Map
  • Network RSS Feeds
  • Submission Guidelines
  • Download the Bylines Network App

© 2022-2026 Bylines Scotland. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9798

No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • Economics
    • Education
    • Scotland
  • Politics
    • Brexit
    • Europe
    • Holyrood
      • Election 2026
    • United Kingdom
    • World
  • Society
    • Arts and entertainment
    • Culture
    • History
  • Health
  • Environment
  • Science and tech
  • Authors and editors
  • Podcast

Newsletter sign up

CROWDFUNDER

© 2022-2026 Bylines Scotland. Powerful Citizen Journalism. ISSN 3049-9798

-
00:00
00:00

Queue

Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00